Communication and Advocacy Training

Catalyzing Advocacy in Science and Engineering: 2019 Workshop

Each year the Graduate School sends two University of Wisconsin–Madison graduate students to learn about science policy and advocacy at the Catalyzing Advocacy in Science and Engineering (CASE) workshop in Washington D.C.  The  2019 CASE Workshop will take place March 24-27, 2019.  

The workshop, sponsored by a coalition of scientific groups including the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) and the Association of American Universities (AAU), teaches STEM graduate and upper-class undergraduates about the structure and organization of Congress, the federal budget and appropriations process, and tools for effective science communication.

Students participate in interactive seminars for both policy-making and communication. They learn about ways to stay engaged and involved after they return to their campuses, through relevant professional societies or on-campus activities. The day after the culmination of the workshop, students form teams and conduct meetings with their elected Members of Congress and congressional staff members, putting into practice what they’ve learned.

Read more about the workshop here.

The Graduate School hosts a competitive process to select the two UW–Madison graduate students to attend the CASE workshop and covers the cost of travel, accommodations, meals, and event registration for the graduate students selected to attend.

2019 Timeline

  • January 8, 2019 – Application opened
  • February 10, 2019 – Application deadline
  • March 24-27, 2019 – CASE Workshop

 

The following two graduate students were selected to attend the CASE workshop in 2019.

Rashaun WilliamsRashaun Williams

PhD Student in Nutritional Sciences, Dawn B. Davis lab

Rashaun is a 2nd-year PhD student in Nutritional Sciences, researching beta-cell biology. His specialization is identifying novel pathways and therapeutic targets critical in the preservation of beta-cell mass and protection.

“Most communication, whether in articles or during conferences, are filled with scientific jargon that is difficult to understand even between scientists in other fields,” he says. “Scientists need to be able to communicate in a way that could be easily understood while still garnering interest for the topic so that our ideas can be taken into consideration when deliberations for important policies are being discussed.”

Sarah AlexanderSarah Alexander

PhD Student in Civil and Environmental Engineering

Sarah is a 3rd-year PhD student in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, studying how variabilities in climate negatively impact vulnerable communities worldwide. Her research focuses on the development, communication, and integration of season-ahead precipitation predictions in Ethiopia to enhance food and water security in the region.

“Scientists are uniquely poised to provide expertise to inform decision-making for positive impact worldwide,” she says. “Yet, it is imperative that scientists are equipped with an understanding of the policy, advocacy process to effectively support, argue for the integration of scientific knowledge into laws and policy decisions.”